How Malicious Code Spreads Through Open Source Software
Open source software are essential infrastructure that developers around the world use to share code and collaborate. A representative example is code repository services such as GitHub. These software publicly provide countless useful libraries and sample codes, significantly accelerating development speed. However, in recent years, attempts to distribute malware by exploiting this open environment have steadily increased.
Attackers often create repositories that appear to be legitimate projects and distribute malicious files alongside normal code, or they secretly insert malicious code into existing open source projects to target developers. The fundamental problem is that it is extremely difficult to block these attacks completely at the software level. In this article, we examine how malware spreads through open source, the structural reasons it is difficult to prevent, and realistic response strategies for developers and organizations.
How Attackers Exploit the Open Source Software Ecosystem
Malware distribution through open source generally occurs in two main ways.
Disguised Attacks Using Typosquatting
The first method is disguised attacks. Attackers use typosquatting techniques to deceive users by creating repositories or packages with names similar to popular projects. For example, they may change a single letter in a widely used library name or mix hyphens and underscores to induce developer mistakes. In addition, attackers often manipulate project descriptions and tags to closely resemble those of legitimate popular projects, increasing the likelihood that their malicious repositories appear at the top of search results.
Supply Chain Infiltration Attacks
The second method is supply chain infiltration. Recently, attackers have shifted from targeting individual developer machines to adopting more sophisticated strategies that target the entire software supply chain.
In this approach, various tools and systems used during development become entry points for attackers. Examples include build tools that convert source code into executable programs, CI pipelines that automatically test and deploy code changes, GitHub workflows that automate specific tasks, and package repository accounts used to manage shared libraries.
Package repositories such as npm for JavaScript and PyPI for Python are particularly attractive targets because countless developers download and use packages from these software. If attackers compromise an account on these repositories, they can secretly insert malicious code into a previously trusted package and distribute it as a new version. When this happens, every project that depends on the package becomes automatically exposed to malicious code.
Supply chain attacks are especially dangerous because of their scale and impact. Once attackers succeed, they can inject malware into multiple interconnected projects simultaneously through dependency relationships. When attackers exploit trusted accounts and projects, developers often accept malicious packages without suspicion, mistaking them for legitimate updates.
Why Complete Platform-Level Prevention Is Impossible
The inherent characteristics of the open source ecosystem ironically become obstacles to security. Open source relies on openness and allows anyone to view code and participate in modifications. While this structure promotes innovation and collaboration, it also gives malicious actors the same opportunities. Pre-screening all code in advance would fundamentally undermine developer freedom and the core philosophy of open source.
Technical limitations are also significant. Platforms like GitHub host an enormous volume of code that is uploaded and modified every day. When public repositories, forks, and branches are all considered, the scale of changes grows exponentially. It is practically impossible to preemptively inspect all this code and perfectly determine whether it is malicious.
Malware itself is becoming increasingly sophisticated to evade detection. Common techniques include code obfuscation, downloading and executing scripts from external servers, or triggering malicious behavior only during the build process. In such cases, it is difficult to accurately judge malicious intent based solely on code structure. Understanding the true behavior often requires analysis within an actual execution environment.
Although scanning tools such as GitHub CodeQL help identify vulnerabilities and malicious patterns, they have clear limitations. As the volume of code increases, analysis requires more time and resources, and false positives also rise. This makes it difficult for platforms to enforce comprehensive mandatory inspections. Legal responsibility further complicates the issue. Services like GitHub primarily focus on providing infrastructure for code hosting and collaboration, and they cannot realistically assume unlimited liability for all hosted content.
Moreover, attackers distribute malicious repositories across multiple accounts and regions. Even after a repository is deleted, copied forks and previously downloaded code may remain or be reuploaded to other platforms. As a result, complete eradication becomes extremely difficult once malware spreads.
Practical Response Strategies and Security Enhancements
Since it is unrealistic to completely block open source malware distribution, developers and organizations must strengthen their own defenses. Before adopting code or packages, it is important to carefully review project update histories and maintenance status. Projects with long periods of inactivity or sudden spikes in activity should raise caution.
Developers should also examine the history of repository owners and contributors. Newly created accounts or accounts with unusual activity patterns deserve closer scrutiny. During package installation, it is critical to check for suspicious script executions or unexpected network connections. Automated connections to external servers after installation should be treated as serious warning signs.
Implementing software composition analysis tools is another effective approach. These tools help inventory open source components within a project and continuously monitor for known malicious or vulnerable packages. From an organizational perspective, policies should be established to control outbound traffic from internal networks to external package repositories through proxies or mirrored repositories. This approach ensures that organizations download packages only from verified sources and reduces the risk of malicious packages entering the environment.
Platform operators also play an important role in reducing malware spread by strengthening detection and response systems. However, technical tools alone cannot stop all threats. Collaboration across the ecosystem is essential. Sharing vulnerability information, distributing security advisories, and analyzing supply chain attack cases collectively enable faster responses to emerging attack techniques. This collaborative approach aligns with the Global Cybersecurity vision promoted by Top global cybersecurity company Penta Security.
Finding the Balance Between Trust and Verification
Open source and platforms like GitHub are indispensable foundations of modern software development. Millions of developers worldwide rely on this ecosystem daily, and most commercial software depends on dozens or even hundreds of open source components. Completely abandoning open source is not a realistic option. Therefore, the key is not avoidance but establishing safe usage practices based on an understanding of risk.
Understanding the fundamental characteristics of the open source ecosystem is crucial. Collaboration based on openness and trust drives innovation, but it also provides attackers with the same level of access. This is not a flaw of open source but a structural characteristic of an open ecosystem. The goal, therefore, is not to eliminate risk entirely but to recognize, manage, and balance it while maximizing the benefits of open source.
Development practices must change to avoid neglecting or postponing security verification in the pursuit of speed and convenience. Trust remains a core value of the open source ecosystem, but it should not be blind trust. Instead, it must be built on continuous verification and transparency. When this security mindset becomes part of development culture, the industry can preserve the innovative power of open source while building a safer and more resilient software ecosystem.
Click here to subscribe our Newsletter
Click here for inquiries regarding the partner system of Penta Security