React2Shell Vulnerability: Why It’s Being Called the Next Log4j
With the recent disclosure of the React2Shell vulnerability, cybersecurity professionals are drawing strong comparisons to the infamous Log4j (Log4Shell) incident that shook the world in 2021. Both vulnerabilities share a terrifying commonality: they allow attackers to take control of a server with just one unauthenticated request, causing widespread alarm among developers and security teams alike.
What Is React2Shell (CVE-2025-55182)?
Classified as CVE-2025-55182, React2Shell is a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability stemming from a design flaw in Flight, the communication protocol used by React Server Components. In simpler terms, this flaw arises from how data is exchanged between the server and browser. When an attacker manipulates this data format, the server may inadvertently execute unauthorized commands.
What makes React2Shell especially dangerous is that it does not require authentication. An attacker can launch an attack with a single HTTP request, much like a regular user visiting a webpage. Alarmingly, even default configurations can leave applications vulnerable without any customization. The vulnerability affects a wide range of systems built with React, Next.js, and related frameworks that rely on React Server Components. In result, it creates a high-impact threat across the web development ecosystem.
Several cybersecurity vendors have rated it React2Shell vulnerability a CVSS score of 10.0, which is the highest possible severity level. Reports have already surfaced of organized threat groups, including those linked to China. Also, they are actively scanning for and attempting to exploit the vulnerability following its public disclosure.
Why React2Shell Is Being Called the “Next Log4j”
The Log4j vulnerability, discovered in the widely used Java-based logging library, was one of the most catastrophic security events in history. By inserting a simple string into server logs, attackers were able to execute remote code, compromising countless systems worldwide.
React2Shell is drawing comparisons to Log4j because both involve remote code execution without authentication. Moreover, both can result in full server compromise, data exfiltration, ransomware deployment, and more. However, while Log4j was nearly ubiquitous across all Java-based systems, React2Shell is more narrowly focused on applications utilizing React Server Components.
Still, security experts suggest that within the modern web ecosystem, React2Shell is as alarming as Log4j. International media have echoed these concerns, using headlines like “Is React2Shell the new Log4Shell” to underscore the threat.
How Attacks Exploiting React2Shell Actually Work
React Server Components render content on the server and deliver it to the browser in a format called Flight. Think of Flight data as blueprints that tell the browser how to construct the UI. The vulnerability lies in how the server processes this data. In other words,it was caused by trusting too much without proper validation.
An attacker who understands the Flight format can disguise malicious commands as legitimate data. The server, interpreting the data as a harmless response, ends up executing harmful code. This can result in backdoors being installed, sensitive database information being leaked, or ransomware and cryptominers being deployed. In other words, the results are similar to how a single log entry in Log4j led to complete server compromise. In both cases, the communication format between components becomes an unexpected attack vector.
How Governments and Companies Are Responding to React2Shell
Following the public disclosure of React2Shell, vendors moved swiftly to issue alerts and provide mitigation guidance. The maintainers of React and Next.js released patched versions and published detailed instructions on identifying affected versions and applying updates.
National cybersecurity teams (CERTs), universities, and public sector organizations have released emergency bulletins prioritizing this vulnerability. Major cloud platforms such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft have published detection rules, log analysis techniques, and signs of compromise.
For businesses, the immediate priority is identifying whether their systems are affected. One of the biggest lessons from the Log4j incident was that many organizations had no clear visibility into where and how the vulnerable library was being used. To avoid repeating that mistake, companies must first audit their services, particularly systems using server-side rendering or React Server Components.
Next, these systems must be upgraded to patched versions as outlined in official security notices. For larger deployments, it’s best to update in a staging environment first, run thorough functionality tests, and then promote the update to production.
React2Shell as a Reminder to Improve Software Asset Management
The Log4j crisis taught the industry the importance of understanding the entire software supply chain and knowing exactly what libraries and frameworks are used in which parts of the system. Although React2Shell appears to affect a narrower set of tools, it raises the same core issue: how well do we understand the inner workings and security risks of the technologies we rely on?
Organizations must treat this as more than just another React vulnerability. It’s a call to assess how transparently they manage their technical assets, how quickly they apply security patches, and how effectively their development and security teams collaborate. The most reliable defense against the next Log4j is a strong, proactive culture of security patching and asset visibility.
Click here to subscribe our Newsletter
Click here for inquiries regarding the partner system of Penta Security